The "spy" numbers decoded.... by Peter Febbroriello Those number stations have been driving a large number of people nutty for a while now...I believe the mystery is over, at least part of it anyway. If the data is copied exactly as broadcast, it forms a series of number groups. Preceding these groups is a count. There is one full count worth of number groups. the first half of each group is a three digit number which is always padded out with zeros. The second half is a two digit number which is also padded. If one were to plot these numbers as separate graphs of data starting with the first half, and then the second half, one does not see much of interest, although the data does seem to have a periodicity, which would never appear in a coded message which used a random code key. If the first group is plotted against the second group, a lattice-like pattern is observed, which resembles the images I have seen of nuclear particle disintigration patterns...but i dont think this is what it is either! The mystery dissolves when the x axis goes from 1 to count, the first group is used for the Y axis and the third group is used for the Z axis. The darned thing is an image of some sort! It's quite obvious, and was probably originally intended to be a transmission of vital scientific importance to a large body of scientists using a very wide variety of data crunching programs and methods. The form of transmission is the most basic possible to get the job done, being quite universal, simple, and easy to decipher without confusion!!! Below, I have reproduced my first and only intercepted transmission of "spy" data. The first file is the raw data. The second file is an X,Y,Z format file for use with most good 3d graphics packages. I would love to get a program that can translate the Z value to a grey scale or false color value for CGA or EGA... raw data taken on 1/19/1989 6:09EST 5047KHZ Female voice count 162 063 22 526 76 967 49 899 42 903 50 042 86 060 43 737 28 416 13 016 58 764 66 889 89 864 05 969 53 019 33 401 81 072 81 985 30 316 80 742 93 595 90 710 67 902 85 121 37 432 47 150 93 508 82 604 25 172 05 197 24 242 78 778 75 434 84 432 93 235 65 135 71 705 62 823 91 878 94 727 57 090 64 554 16 873 48 843 83 671 71 495 55 344 16 325 03 737 51 661 18 756 64 823 98 963 04 484 93 871 70 474 74 343 76 464 48 578 55 476 55 837 21 212 22 658 77 387 22 210 30 488 77 009 41 024 04 779 79 040 65 375 43 052 06 138 64 103 12 300 23 290 71 325 66 169 37 167 76 570 89 531 96 384 06 635 63 131 12 321 97 994 69 333 61 627 58 822 30 245 45 033 27 625 03 136 98 650 20 045 32 231 75 269 18 737 10 260 72 349 57 486 64 752 08 667 11 791 19 087 93 580 08 248 49 381 01 538 66 969 31 235 64 036 91 784 80 097 37 933 54 066 18 681 10 004 13 296 08 172 44 514 15 548 43 462 27 327 85 996 24 493 70 299 05 045 21 917 85 100 94 490 31 068 75 648 29 882 36 635 89 297 09 928 56 447 00 277 90 225 18 380 28 832 66 010 28 121 14 826 17 689 80 070 52 959 56 321 21 593 09 065 76 148 55 339 45 126 26 437 83 714 14 286 65 943 62 453 84 186 84 544 76 310 01 ----------------------------------------------- X,Y,Z version If the image is too narrow, I would suggest expanding the X value by multiplying by a convenient factor. If you know what the data really pertains to, you might be able to incorporate the proper scale into this axis! 1, 63, 22 2,526, 76 3,967, 49 4,899, 42 5,903, 50 6, 42, 86 7, 60, 43 8,737, 28 9,416, 13 10, 16, 58 11,764, 66 12,889, 89 13,864, 5 14,969, 53 15, 19, 33 16,401, 81 17, 72, 81 18,985, 30 19,316, 80 20,742, 93 21,595, 90 22,710, 67 23,902, 85 24,121, 37 25,432, 47 26,150, 93 27,508, 82 28,604, 25 29,172, 5 30,197, 24 31,242, 78 32,778, 75 33,434, 84 34,432, 93 35,235, 65 36,135, 71 37,705, 62 38,823, 91 39,878, 94 40,727, 57 41, 90, 64 42,554, 16 43,873, 48 44,843, 83 45,671, 71 46,495, 55 47,344, 16 48,325, 3 49,737, 51 50,661, 18 51,756, 64 52,823, 98 53,963, 4 54,484, 93 55,871, 70 56,474, 74 57,343, 76 58,464, 48 59,578, 55 60,476, 55 61,837, 21 62,212, 22 63,658, 77 64,387, 22 65,210, 30 66,488, 77 67, 9, 41 68, 24, 4 69,779, 79 70, 40, 65 71,375, 43 72, 52, 6 73,138, 64 74,103, 12 75,300, 23 76,290, 71 77,325, 66 78,169, 37 79,167, 76 80,570, 89 81,531, 96 82,384, 6 83,635, 63 84,131, 12 85,321, 97 86,994, 69 87,333, 61 88,627, 58 89,822, 30 90,245, 45 91, 33, 27 92,625, 03 93,136, 98 94,650, 20 95, 45, 32 96,231, 75 97,269, 18 98,737, 10 99,260, 72 100,349, 57 101,486, 64 102,752, 8 103,667, 11 104,791, 19 105, 87, 93 106,580, 8 107,248, 49 108,381, 1 109,538, 66 110,969, 31 111,235, 64 112, 36, 91 113,784, 80 114, 97, 37 115,933, 54 116, 66, 18 117,681, 10 118, 4, 13 119,296, 8 120,172, 44 121,514, 15 122,548, 43 123,462, 27 124,327, 85 125,996, 24 126,493, 70 127,299, 5 128, 45, 21 129,917, 85 130,100, 94 131,490, 31 132, 68, 75 133,648, 29 134,882, 36 135,635, 89 136,297, 9 137,928, 56 138,447, 0 139,277, 90 140,225, 18 141,380, 28 142,832, 66 143, 10, 28 144,121, 14 145,826, 17 146,689, 80 147, 70, 52 148,959, 56 149,321, 21 150,593, 9 151, 65, 76 152,148, 55 153,339, 45 154,126, 26 155,437, 83 156,714, 14 157,286, 65 158,943, 62 159,453, 84 160,186, 84 161,544, 76 162,310, 1 --------------------- If you have anything to add to this file, send it to me and i will update and re-upload. I would be eager to hear any rebuttals too! Peter Febbroriello 469 Main Street Torrington, CT 06790 cis 70335,243 genie: Febbroriello plink: ahn960 mci: 244-8141 telex: 6502448141 bix: pfebbroriello